[governance] IPv4-v6 - "coexistence" not transition - operational issues surfacing

[Bertrand de La Chapelle]

Hi all,


On 2/21/08, McTim <dogwallah at gmail.com> wrote:

There won't be A remedy. the 2 protocols were never designed to be
"interoperable".  There are a variety of "remedies" that will allow v4
hosts to communicate with v6 hosts and vice versa.


Can anyone explain why those who designed IPV6 did not think about the
transition path and the necessary interoperability between both protocols ?

Best

Bertrand

-- 
____________________
Bertrand de La Chapelle
Délégué Spécial pour la Société de l'Information / Special Envoy for the
Information Society
Ministère des Affaires Etrangères et Européennes/ French Ministry of Foreign
and European Affairs
Tel : +33 (0)6 11 88 33 32

"Le plus beau métier des hommes, c'est d'unir les hommes" Antoine de Saint
Exupéry
("there is no better mission for humans than uniting humans")
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20080221/ff71f800/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance