[governance] Reconstituting MAG (Tech/admin language)

[Milton L Mueller]

> -----Original Message-----
> 
> So under your scheme, the caucus would have to think carefully about
> nominating people who, say, have played roles in ICANN, e.g. NomCom,
ALAC,
> GNSO....?  When did the caucus become the Spartacus Youth League, I
missed
> it...
> 

Bill, this is unfair and unhelpful. The point should be obvious. ICANN
and other IOs _already have_ governance authority under the present
regime, and IGF is supposed to be relatively independent of them. People
who are employees and Board members of those organizations often have a
vested interest in protecting them from criticism or change. I have no
problem with including a few people from ICANN+ on the MAG in order to
have their voice present. But the idea that somehow the MAG will be
completely insulated from and ignorant of their perspective unless the
deck is stacked with them is not realistic. 
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance