[governance] Themes for the coming IGFs

[Meryem Marzouki]

Le 11 déc. 08 à 14:05, Jeanette Hofmann a écrit :

> I fully agree. While professional broadcasters are good at keeping  
> the crowd entertained, the usually lack the sense for the political  
> assues at hand. Moreover, they don't want to achieve anything.

It's the IGF itself that is refusing any tangible outcome.

> The discussion on security seemed to me a debate for the sake of  
> debating.

Is there any other purpose a "conversation" could have? A debate,  
even non conclusive, is not necessarily a waste of time, this is not  
my point, but one has to acknowledge that the IGF, in its current  
form, can't lead to anything else than a debate.

Meryem____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance