[governance] USG on ICANN - no movement here

Jeffrey A. Williams jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com
Sun Aug 10 06:06:46 EDT 2008


McTim and all,

  Indeed V4 is nearly exausted.  2011 may be optomistic as
an end of PA space date.  ICANN's push for V6 is still looking
bad as well for a number of already known reasons, security
being a primary reason.  But than again when I was on the
v6 development group, I saw early on that v6 was not the way
to go.  So the chickens have or will be coming home to roost.

  Allocating to governments is indeed an option but a poor one
for many already known reasons, one of which you mentioned
McTim.

  China moving ever so slowly but surely to v9 may overtake
in a few years...

McTim wrote:

> Hello Milton,
>
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 5:26 AM, Milton L Mueller <mueller at syr.edu> wrote:
> >
> >> not to mention not physically possible, as countries don't "get" IP
> >> addresses, organisations do.
> >
> > McTim, there is nothing "physically impossible" about delegating IP
> > addresses to nations first.
>
> Well, in terms of v4, it's certainly not possible, as there are not
> enough addresses left, perhaps I should have been more specific.  My
> points remain however;
>
> A) it's not the current model of allocation
> B) it's unlikely that the IANA would allocate to countries (instead of
> to RIRs, as the nro would have smt to say about this idea).
> C) This was not (and is still not) well understood````
>
> We probably agree that it is politically
>
> technically undesirable due to deaggregation (or lack of aggregation
> to be more precise).
>
> > undesirable, but don't make the mistake of trying to make a policy point
> > by making false technical claims.
>
> not a technical claim at all, was merely pointing out that you can't
> allocate on a grand scale something that you don't possess on such a
> scale (IPv4).
>
> --
> Cheers,
>
> McTim
> mctim.blogspot.com
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>      governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>
> For all list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Regards,

Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 281k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS.
div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail
jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com
My Phone: 214-244-4827

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance



More information about the Governance mailing list