[governance] IGC nomcom process and results

[Avri Doria]

On 25 Apr 2008, at 09:59, Adam Peake wrote:

>
> So we should be using that process for the MAG.  That's a shame.

not sure why.  i think it work well.  and it was a decision made  
during the organizational period.

of course we can change it, though i, for one, am not convinced it  
needs to be changed


>
>
> As soon as we have a voting membership (apologies for mentioning  
> that again :-)  I think we need to re-write a lot of stuff.  But not  
> now, May consultations first.

that was always the plan.  after we gained experience then we could  
change any of it.  though in my opinion the nomcom processes have  
worked well.  and except that in this case the processes we had  
decided on weren't referenced and that is, at least partly, my fault  
for not having made sure that the web site pointed to them clearly.   
it is obviously wrong to assume that people should review the charter  
before engaging in any caucus official activities.

>
>

>
> Better to call it Vittorio's site, he maintains it.  I just pay for  
> the name.

that helps.

i thought there was another site i was missing a pointer to.

btw, i think of www.igcaucus.org as the igc caucus's site - though i  
pay for the name.

a.


____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance