[governance] IGC Nomcom - Slate of candidates

[Carlos Afonso]

I can't, neither do the LA&C Caucus. But this does not preclude us from 
stating our opinion on the quality of the result.

frt rgds

--c.a.

Milton L Mueller wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> It is curious that the arguments I have read so far try to 
>> convince us numbers are irrelevant, so why then resist to include one 
>> more from our list??
> 
> Simple answer -- and you should know what it is. You can't re-open a
> process like this unless you want to do the whole thing over again. And
> that means anyone else dissatisfied, not just you, has the same status
> to reopen it.
> 
> We chose to do this through a Nomcom process. Nominating Committees are
> by definition non-transparent bodies that make selections based on
> private discussions among themselves. 
> 
> You can't say, "we accept a Nominating Committee to make the
> recommendations for the caucus" and then say, AFTER you see the results,
> "well, no, we don't want the Nomcom to make the decision, we want to
> change the results based on complaints on the list." Either the Nomcom
> makes the decisions or it doesn't.
> 
> Don't like the process? Change it next time. 
> 
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>      governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
> 
> For all list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
> 
> 

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance