[governance] problem with the sessions: number of participants

[Bret Fausett]

-----Original Message-----
From: Sylvia Caras <sylvia.caras at gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2007 11:58 AM
To: governance at lists.cpsr.org
Subject: Re: [governance] problem with the sessions: number of participants

On 10/20/07, Ken Lohento <klohento at panos-ao.org> wrote:
>
> All this proves at least that there is a real need to establish, as now
> the AG mandate implies more formally, clear criteria, methods of work,
> for speaker selection or for the AG decision making process for example.

I was delighted that the actual date was set a year ahead, announced
in Athens.  But then I think Brazil started late to make decisions.
It's probably too late for this year, but it seems to me that a
post-IGF open planning meeting (for instance Friday November 16) with
the next host country representatives could help incorporate past
experience and clarify.

Sylvia
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance