[governance] problem with the sessions: number of participants

[Adam Peake]

At 12:47 PM +0200 10/19/07, Meryem Marzouki wrote:
>Le 19 oct. 07 à 12:08, Adam Peake a écrit :
>>>Personally, I'd have taken the Noah's
>>>ark approach, get two value-adding speakers from each of four stakeholder
>>>species
>>
>>Not a bad approach.  Please go through the 
>>advisory group list and define membership of 
>>the 4 groups.  And what do you do with those 
>>who don't fit, they should have a say.
>
>So how it comes that they did fit once, when the AG group was formed?


Those that don't fit are probably very few (so 
tough to them!), I was thinking of something else 
that's not quite relevant.  Yes, it could be done 
by asking the 4 groups to select 2 each.

Adam




>Has any genetic mutation happened? From which group to which other?
>
>Meryem____________________________________________________________
>You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     governance at lists.cpsr.org
>To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>
>For all list information and functions, see:
>     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance