Alternative DNS systems and net neutrality - Was: Re: [governance] DNSsec and allternative DNS system

[Meryem Marzouki]

Le 16 nov. 07 à 12:54, Suresh Ramasubramanian a écrit :

> Meryem Marzouki wrote:
>
>> My dear Veni, I'm afraid this kind of saying exists almost
>> everywhere. It simply illustrates conservatism, inertia, lazziness,
>> fear of any new idea, defense of privilege, etc. No, the current
>> model is not working. It's technically working, but it's not
>> politically working. From a general interest public policy view, it's
>
> Umm.. if it doesn't work technically, it just doesn't work, period.
>
> If it doesn't work politically, what globally scoped / international
> initiative "works" in that sense?

One that is based on (1) decentralization, (2) minimal global  
consistency and neutrality rules and (3) sovereignty in policy making  
at its terminal nodes. Doesn't this kind of architecture sound familiar?

>> What does that mean exactly? It needs precision. Which law, where to
>> enforce it, for which crime or offence? And do you really think these
>> problems are currently solved?
>
> And what, in this new and hopefully decentralized system of igov,  
> is going
> to lead to a solution for this?

Let's follow some common sense methodology: first, what is exactly  
the new problem?

>> Do you seriously mean that such problems would be created, that they
>> don't already exist?
>
> No. Just entirely that much harder to solve.

I'm amazed at how one can come to such a conclusion while not even  
considering the situation where the problems could occur..

Best,
Meryem ____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance