[WSIS CS-Plenary] April fool's day? Was Re: [governance] APC Statement as IGF II closes

[Meryem Marzouki]

Le 15 nov. 07 à 16:03, karen banks a écrit :

> ps.. and meryem, to some extent you are right, not a typo so much,  
> ut open to misinterpretation - the word 'definition' shouldn't be  
> in the phrase, as it creates just this kind of misundertanding.. we  
> will edit the statement

Please do if indeed this was not what was meant. There are so many  
people and groups and institutions.. that would be more than happy to  
understand it as it actually reads in this first version. If indeed  
APC understanding is what you specified in your previous reply  
("irrespecive of how anyone might feel about the illegaility of  
specific content, it is illegal - but 'harmful' content, is  
essentially content that some interested group wishes to make illegal  
- and the raod to that, is largely via self and co-regulatory schemes  
- and often implemented by inappropraite parties.."), then may I  
suggest other wordings that you may or may not use:

"WG on the impact of content regulation by technical and soft law  
measures on human rights and the rule of law"

And this working group would actually be able to build on huge  
existing work.

Meryem____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance