AW: [governance] bureau yes bureau no??? ... Nomenclature vsfunctionality

[Kleinwächter, Wolfgang]

Thanks Milton
 
you are right. But this is also relevant for the terminology "framework convention".
 
wolfgang

________________________________

Von: Milton Mueller [mailto:Mueller at syr.edu]
Gesendet: Do 24.05.2007 16:49
An: Governance Governance Caucus; avri at psg.com
Betreff: Re: [governance] bureau yes bureau no??? ... Nomenclature vsfunctionality





>>> avri at psg.com 5/24/2007 1:56 AM >>>
>we cannot call it a Bureau as that word has too much baggage
>and a   particular meaning especially to the governments in
>the process.  

Yes, Adam has convinced me of this and after investigating I am
convinced completely that he is right.

>just as the IGF could not call dynamic coalitions working groups or 
>task forces or work parties ...

Exactly, these terminological choices, which seemed perfectly sensible
to our community, meant something very different to governments. So we
have to be very careful about terms used.


____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance


____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance