[governance] igc at igf consultations

[Vittorio Bertola]

DRAKE William ha scritto:
> Avri,
> 
> Thanks for jogging our memories.  Well then, Parminder, any chance you 
> could draft just a few lines addressing Adam's key concerns for approval 
> at a meeting Wednesday morning?  We could read it out and submit actual 
> text post hoc.  I think a key point, in light of Adam's prior message, 
> would be reaffirm the practice established for Athens of the mAG 
> approving all workshop proposals (or at least the 'open' ones, which any 
> non-selected 'linked' ones could become).  Bottom line, since the main 
> sessions inevitably will not accomodate all preferences, there must be 
> free speech and an open 'market of ideas' elsewhere or the IGF will have 
> been not only downsized, but distorted.

If the caucus can't manage to approve something new on Wednesday, also 
reprinting our statement from February (which, I'm quite sure, was not 
circulated in writing) could help. It already had a number of points on 
workshops etc, though it did not address explicitly the "bureau" idea 
since it had not come up yet.
-- 
vb.                   Vittorio Bertola - vb [a] bertola.eu   <--------
-------->  finally with a new website at http://bertola.eu/  <--------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance