[governance] IGC statement to IGF MAG

[William Drake]

Hi v,

On 5/7/07 4:48 PM, "Vittorio Bertola" <vb at bertola.eu> wrote:

> This said, I agree that the four issues that are currently in the draft
> are quite important, so let's not make this bigger than it is: I would
> suggest that we propose these four as additional main sessions, and let
> the AG decide what to do with our suggestion, though I suspect that the
> reply might be "can't you do these as workshops?".

Right, replacing the speed sessions, with the expectation that they will
indeed reply by suggesting workshops.

How about you and Parminder slap three intro sentences on the front and 1)
do a consensus call and 2) begin to fire up the voting machinery for when
that fails?   

BTW another option would be not to mess with the latter and just do a
coalition of the interested sign on.  We could probably have the thing sent
to the secretariat in a few days with 5-10 organizational supporters, which
is enough to put the ideas on the table.

Best,

Bill


____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance