[governance] IGC statement to IGF MAG

[Jeremy Malcolm]

Vittorio Bertola wrote:
>> In my understanding there is no difference. All 4 themes are being 
>> suggested
>> for plenary/ main sessions. 
> 
> Perhaps there is a misunderstanding: it seemed to me that we would ask 
> "a main session" to be specifically devoted to each of the four issues - 
> that would make four new main sessions to be added to the already 
> scheduled ones, and there's no space for this to happen in the schedule.

But as I and others have been saying, forget about the schedule.  There 
are many ways in which room could be made.  For example, lose the speed 
dialogue sessions on access/openness/security/diversity, and use those 
sessions for what we propose instead.  Or indeed, vice versa; there is 
no reason why the thematic emphasis needs to be the same every year.

-- 
Jeremy Malcolm LLB (Hons) B Com
Internet and Open Source lawyer, IT consultant, actor
host -t NAPTR 1.0.8.0.3.1.2.9.8.1.6.e164.org|awk -F! '{print $3}'
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance