[governance] Programme outline and schedule released

[Veni Markovski]

At 18:49 5/1/2007  -0300, you wrote:
>Veni Markovski wrote:
>>I hope we can try to be more constructive, and decide first what 
>>COULD be discussed, and not use try to define what the IGF SHOULD 
>>do, and stressing that several times (see below quotes)?
>
>Interesting point of view... who determines the "could"? Is this a 
>multistakeholder environment or a bunch of order followers??

exactly, even if the orders come from Milton, we could, but should we 
follow them ;)
May be it's a misunderstanding. My point about the "could" is that 
certainly we may discuss everything, but there are aspects of the 
discussion, which were set in the TA, and we can't escape from that 
framework. If we try to go beyond that framework, this could be 
easily used to undermine all the efforts of the civil society... You 
don't want that, do you?

> > ...article 72, for example, should be read
>>fully, not sentence by sentence, and not half sentences only. 
>>Here's a simple example:
>>72 point a says: Discuss public policy issues related to key 
>>elements of Internet governance in order to foster the 
>>sustainability, robustness, security, stability and development of the Internet
>
>and point "j" says:
>
>j. Discuss, inter alia, issues relating to critical Internet resources;
>
>Read it in full, as per your own recommendation, Veni.


That's exactly the point I was making - no one could try to interpete 
the TA. Instead, we just need to follow it - in its full text. Not by 
sentences, or by paragraphs. And we might - just might - allow 
people, who have been part of the process, to give some ideas.

veni  

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance