[governance] Muti-stakeholder Group structure (some ideas)

[Louis Pouzin]

This rift about who should feel guilty of spilling restricted info sounds a bit like snowing the gist of the issue. I do concur with Parminder that Meryem gave a crystal clear roundup of the Chatham house rules. She aptly pinpointed the "rule of silence" followed by the MAG (members). Isn't there a need to reassess the CS representation in this cloak and dagger operation ?

Cheers
- -
On Sun, 10 Jun 2007 01:13:18 +0200, Meryem Marzouki wrote:

>The MAG is not operating under the Chatham house rule. It's rather operating under the rule of silence. How it comes that such an important exchange as the one forwarded by Guru has not even been evoked by any MAG member, and specially by the CS members of the MAG?

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance