[governance] Muti-stakeholder Group structure (some ideas)

[mgurst at vcn.bc.ca]

"Transparency, accountability, rule of law..." It's really hard for me to
see what Civil Society issues are more important than those that arise
from this particular exchange.

I believe that this is called the Internet "Governance" Forum, not the
West Twickenham Social Circle... If the governance process of the
governance forum is not held to some level of appropriate practice then
how can one have any reliance on the outcome of that process?

And to ensure that this is not something "more than a bit of tantalizing
fluff" then CS should surely be working with redoubled and single-minded
effort to ensure that the process is in fact "transparent, accountable,
subject to the rule of law" etc.etc. by for example insisting on some
appropriate "Ceasar's wife" funding mechanism...

MG
>
> I would prefer to see the list working on civil society's issues and
> not on some bit of tantalizing fluff.
>
> a.
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>      governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>
> For all list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>
>
> !DSPAM:2676,466bec71285508099411786!
>


____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance