[governance] Re: [WSIS CS-Plenary] ECOSOC reviewing WSIS follow up and implementation: CSTD, UNGIS, ALF, IGF, GAID

[Milton L Mueller]

You have my full support on this. --MM

________________________________

From: plenary-admin at wsis-cs.org [mailto:plenary-admin at wsis-cs.org] On
Behalf Of Parminder
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 12:20 PM
To: plenary at wsis-cs.org; governance at lists.cpsr.org
Subject: RE: [governance] Re: [WSIS CS-Plenary] ECOSOC reviewing WSIS
follow up and implementation: CSTD, UNGIS, ALF, IGF, GAID



Hi All

 

This is regarding the discussions we have been having on the SG's report
to ECOSOC and the mention in it of consultations for the process of
enhanced cooperation for global public policy regarding the Internet. 

 

It is fine if we request CONGO to add the following on the behalf of the
IGC in its statement.

 

This is in reference to the SG's report stating that, and we quote,
"Consultations are under way to start a process towards enhanced
cooperation among all relevant stakeholders with regard to Internet
governance, as requested by the Summit". Para 71 of the Tunis Agenda
clearly states that "

the process towards enhanced cooperation, ...will involve all
stakeholders". However, the Civil Society IG Caucus notes with concern
that civil society has not been involved at all in the consultations
mentioned in the SG's report. We do not even have any information about
this consultation, despite directly requesting the SG office regarding
it. 

 

We request ECOSOC to ensure that the multistakeholder principle in WSIS
follow-up is fully adhered to as per WSIS documents, in general spirit,
and in specific mandates as in case of the process towards enhanced
cooperation, where as mentioned above, the WSIS injunction for
multistakeholder involvement is clearly not being complied with. The
caucus will like to be invited to and involved in these consultations,
along with other civil society groups. Since a lot of civil society
groups interested in IG issues converge at IGF meeting, holding such
consultations on the sidelines of the IGF meeting may be useful. We will
also like to be kept updated on the consultations with other
stakeholders. 

 

(ends)

 

 

This has to go to CONGO by 22nd. So if we need to seek consensus over
21st and 22nd, we have only 19th and 20th for comments and amendments.
Thanks

 

Parminder 

 

________________________________________________

Parminder Jeet Singh

IT for Change, Bangalore

Bridging Development Realities and Technological Possibilities 

Tel: (+91-80) 2665 4134, 2653 6890

Fax: (+91-80) 4146 1055

www.ITforChange.net 

 

> -----Original Message-----

> From: plenary-admin at wsis-cs.org [mailto:plenary-admin at wsis-cs.org] On

> Behalf Of Vittorio Bertola

> Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 1:59 PM

> To: governance at lists.cpsr.org; William Drake

> Cc: Plenary

> Subject: Re: [governance] Re: [WSIS CS-Plenary] ECOSOC reviewing WSIS

> follow up and implementation: CSTD, UNGIS, ALF, IGF, GAID

> 

> [Please note that by using 'REPLY', your response goes to the entire
list.

> Kindly use individual addresses for responses intended for specific

> people]

> 

> Click http://wsis.funredes.org/plenary/ to access automatic
translation of

> this message!

> _______________________________________

> 

> William Drake ha scritto:

> > With regard to enhanced cooperation, as Parminder notes, the IG
caucus

> > already agreed a letter months ago saying we've been told nothing
and

> > would like/expect to be consulted in keeping with the spirit of the
TA.

> > There is no need for prolonged debate over whether and how to
reiterate

> > already adopted language.  Parminder and Vittorio should just draft
a

> > few sentences referencing the prior letter and saying these concerns
are

> > raised anew by the SG Report and we look forward to a response, and

> > submit it for a quick consensus call under the charter procedure.

> 

> Possibly, the report saying "consultations are under way" is an
elegant

> way to say "we've not been doing our homework, so we'll rush something

> up asap". Nonetheless, my feeling is that everyone realized that that

> process can't just be deferred forever, so things could actually start

> to move between now and Rio. So I agree with you, I think that it
would

> be a good idea to issue a statement reminding that civil society has
to

> be involved in this process. I'll work it out with Parminder (he might

> already have a 3-page draft ready :-D ).

> --

> vb.                   Vittorio Bertola - vb [a] bertola.eu   <--------

> -------->  finally with a new website at http://bertola.eu/  <--------

> _______________________________________________

> Plenary mailing list

> Plenary at wsis-cs.org

> http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/plenary


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.8/906 - Release Date:
7/17/2007 6:30 PM


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20070718/3c5c415d/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: message-footer.txt
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20070718/3c5c415d/attachment.txt>