[governance] RE: [WSIS CS-Plenary] ECOSOC reviewing WSIS follow up and implementation: CSTD, UNGIS, ALF, IGF, GAID

Mon Jul 9 05:20:18 EDT 2007

This is about enhanced cooperation process and the SGs report to the ECOSOC
which will be considered later this month. The report has been forwarded by
Philippe with his email below.  

> Internet Governance Forum and enhanced cooperation

>The SG Report states that WSIS requested the Secretary-General to convene
the Internet Governance Forum, a new forum for multi-stakeholder policy
dialogue, to >discuss, inter alia, public policy issues related to Internet
governance in order to foster the sustainability, robustness, security,
stability and development of the >Internet. The inaugural meeting, entitled
Internet governance for development, was held in Athens from 30 October to
2 November 2006, and the second meeting is >scheduled to be held in Rio de
Janeiro from 12 to 15 November 2007. Consultations are under way to start a
process towards enhanced cooperation among all >relevant stakeholders with
regard to Internet governance, as requested by the Summit (§ 14 of
E/2007/76).

Civil society, and IGC on its behalf and of itself, should obviously make a
comment that we are unaware of the consultation process being carried out,
and not only we have never been contacted, our official correspondence to
the special advisor to SG remains unanswered and un-acknowledged. We should
insist that the consultations underway should include civil society and
this caucus. These consultations should involve CS especially because the
documents speaks of towards enhanced cooperation among all >relevant
stakeholders with regard to Internet governance and obviously any enhanced
cooperation cannot involve all stakeholders when its preparatory doesnt
involve all stakeholders. 

CONGO is ready to include such language on behalf of CS and / or IGC if we
can agree on it, in its statement to the ECOSOC when this report is
considered with regard to its WSIS parts on 23rd this. 

It is my personal opinion that something to the effect written by me above
is the least that IGC must say at the moment
. I will like to hear the views
of the other .

Are members willing to engage with this issue at all? If so, how? 

Philippe can take in the views contributed on this list, and if there is a
fair consensus these can go on IGCs behalf. 

I must remind that the time is short.

Parminder 

________________________________________________

Parminder Jeet Singh

IT for Change, Bangalore

Bridging Development Realities and Technological Possibilities 

Tel: (+91-80) 2665 4134, 2653 6890

Fax: (+91-80) 4146 1055

 <http://www.itforchange.net/> www.ITforChange.net 

  _____  

From: plenary-admin at wsis-cs.org [mailto:plenary-admin at wsis-cs.org] On Behalf
Of CONGO WSIS - Philippe Dam
Sent: Friday, July 06, 2007 11:35 PM
To: plenary at wsis-cs.org; bureau at wsis-cs.org; governance at lists.cpsr.org
Cc: rbloem at ngocongo.org; 'CONGO - Philippe Dam'
Subject: [WSIS CS-Plenary] ECOSOC reviewing WSIS follow up and
implementation: CSTD, UNGIS, ALF, IGF, GAID
Importance: High

Dear all, 

As some of you might know, the UN ECOSOC opened its annual substantive
session earlier this week. 

Issues related to the follow up and implementation of WSIS will be discussed
and addressed by ECOSOC later this month (according to the provisional
timetable of the ECOSOC session, WSIS follow up might be tabled on 23rd and
on 25th July).

In general, the documents addressing WSIS follow up to be considered by
ECOSOC will be:

-       The SG report on integrated and coordinated implementation of the
outcomes of and follow up to major UN conferences and summit (E/2007/76,
here attached, to be discussed on 23 July; it contains a series of
paragraphs in relation to WSIS); See below for some extracts on the various
post WSIS processes.

-       The final report of the 10th session of the Commission on Science
and Technology for Development (21-25 May 2007), including the two WSIS
related decisions of the CSTD (on the flow of information for WSIS follow
up, and on multi-year programme of work): see E/2007/31, hereby attached as
well, to be discussed on 25 July.

As far as we understood from diplomats here in Geneva, there might not be
any additional negotiation in Geneva. It is expected that the CSDT decision
will be confirmed by ECOSOC. We will anyway monitor the on going process and
keep you posted  and hopefully engaged. 

CONGO would be willing to address the ECOSOC on these various issues, under
the two segments that might be available in this regard. We will of course
need your remarks, suggestions and feedback.

General note

The SG report recognises that implementation and follow-up require a broad
engagement of non-governmental stakeholders and partners (§ 12 of
E/2007/76).

Commission on Science and Technology for Development

The SG report seems quite restrictive in defining the involvement of CS
actors in the CSTD processes. Contrary to the Tunis Agenda which requested
to take into account the multi-stakeholder approach, the SG Report defines
quite poorly the CSTD as an intergovernmental process with contributions
from non-governmental stakeholders channelled through the multi-stakeholder
Global Alliance for Information and Communication Technologies and
Development (§14 of E/2007/76). CONGO considers that this quotation is not
reflecting paragraph 105 of the Tunis Agenda for the IS and ECOSOC
Resolution 2006/46: we understand GAID is a multi-stakeholder component in
CSTD and ECOSOC, but certainly not the only one, and that NGO contributions
should not be channelled / screened before reaching the CSTD / ECOSOC: CONGO
is therefore willing to correct that in the ECOSOC Plenary.

UNGIS and Action Line Facilitators process

The SG Report only provides a factual description of the creation of the UN
Group for the Information Society (Coordination among the United Nations
system entities is undertaken by the United Nations Group on the Information
Society, created by the Secretary-General in accordance with the request of
the Summit, § 14 of E/2007/76) and of the May 2007 cluster of WSIS action
line facilitation meetings.

Internet Governance Forum and enhanced cooperation

The SG Report states that WSIS requested the Secretary-General to convene
the Internet Governance Forum, a new forum for multi-stakeholder policy
dialogue, to discuss, inter alia, public policy issues related to Internet
governance in order to foster the sustainability, robustness, security,
stability and development of the Internet. The inaugural meeting, entitled
Internet governance for development, was held in Athens from 30 October to
2 November 2006, and the second meeting is scheduled to be held in Rio de
Janeiro from 12 to 15 November 2007. Consultations are under way to start a
process towards enhanced cooperation among all relevant stakeholders with
regard to Internet governance, as requested by the Summit (§ 14 of
E/2007/76).

Global Alliance for ICT and Development

The SG Report includes an annexed two-page description of GAID and a
synopsis of its activities. See pages 21-22 of E/2007/76.

Please send us your comments and suggestions in this regard. We will come
back to you early next week with more details.

All the best, 

Philippe

Philippe Dam
CONGO - Information Society &
Human Rights Coordinator
11, Avenue de la Paix
CH-1202 Geneva
Tel: +41 22 301 1000
Fax: +41 22 301 2000
E-mail:  <mailto:wphilippe.dam at ngocongo.org> philippe.dam at ngocongo.org
Website:  <blocked::http://www.ngocongo.org> www.ngocongo.org 

The Conference of NGOs (CONGO) is an international, membership association
that facilitates the participation of NGOs in United Nations debates and
decisions. Founded in 1948, CONGO's major objective is to ensure the
presence of NGOs in exchanges among the world's governments and United
Nations agencies on issues of global concern.  For more information see our
website at  <blocked::http://www.ngocongo.org/> www.ngocongo.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20070709/658009f7/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: message-footer.txt
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20070709/658009f7/attachment.txt>