[governance] Re: Enhanced cooperation
Adam Peake
ajp at glocom.ac.jp
Mon Jan 8 10:54:28 EST 2007
At 4:38 PM +0100 1/8/07, Vittorio Bertola wrote:
>Adam Peake ha scritto:
>>I thought people wanted to know what was happening with enhanced
>>cooperation and someone would draft a letter to Nitin Desai asking
>>for an update (so we'd know how to approach the question in the
>>consultation.)
>
>We should actually send that letter, it's an important point -
>however, AFAIK, it seems that many governments are now interpreting
>"enhanced cooperation" as "a slightly reformed GAC inside ICANN".
I agree, they do see it that way. But Nitin was asked by the
Secretary General to look into how to convene the process, so I would
still hope he can respond.
(I am actually only following up on a general comments from a few
members last year -- my preference is still for "enhanced
cooperation" to be kept out of the IGF. But if its something the
caucus would like us to push in the MAG then I think we need this
kind of information.)
>--
>vb. [Vittorio Bertola - v.bertola [a] bertola.eu.org]<-----
>http://bertola.eu.org/ <- Prima o poi...
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
For all list information and functions, see:
http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
More information about the Governance
mailing list