[governance] Proposed Criteria for CS IGC Appeals Team

[Nyangkwe Agien Aaron]

Dear All

I agree with Parminder on what he says concerning the succesful candidate.
But can he kindly let bare his mind on the worries concerning
neutrality which to my understanding refers to fairness.
regards
Nyangkwe

On 1/8/07, Parminder <parminder at itforchange.net> wrote:
>
>
> Dear everyone,
>
> A happy new year to everyone; and thanks to the noncom for all the good
> work.
>
> I have the following suggestions on the selection criteria for the noncom to
> consider.
>
> > Nomcom will primarily select persons based on their knowledge and
> > experience of issues faced by the caucus and their neutrality.
>
> Can we replace 'neutrality' with 'fairness and discretion'. This
> 'neutrality' word makes me uncomfortable....
>
>
> And similarly see if you will like to change
>
> > The successful candidate should be a person with thoughtful and
> > unbiased consideration
>
> to
>
> > The successful candidate should be a person, who in the role of judgment
> on the behalf of the IGC, is with (thoughtful and)
> > unbiased consideration
>
>
> Regards
>
> Parminder
>
>
> ________________________________________________
> Parminder Jeet Singh
> IT for Change, Bangalore
> Bridging Development Realities and Technological Possibilities
> Tel: (+91-80) 2665 4134, 2653 6890
> Fax: (+91-80) 4146 1055
> www.ITforChange.net
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: izumiaizu at gmail.com [mailto:izumiaizu at gmail.com] On Behalf Of Izumi
> > AIZU
> > Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 2:04 PM
> > To: governance at lists.cpsr.org
> > Subject: [governance] Proposed Criteria for CS IGC Appeals Team
> >
> > Dear list,
> >
> > A Happy New Year to all!
> >
> > As announced in the time line attached at the end of this e-mail,
> > Nomcom for Appeals Team would like to propose the following
> > as the criteria for selecting the Appeals Team members.
> >
> > We tried to be as simple as possible, but also like to convey our ideas
> > clearly.
> > If you have any comment, suggestions or questions, please put them on
> > this list. The criteria below is close to final, but if we think
> > additional suggestions make more sense, we will incorporate them.
> >
> > In the mean time, we will send out the Call for Nomination tomorrow,
> > so that people can start to volunteer. Upon closing the nomination on
> > Jan 21, which is our mutual challenge, Nomcom will begin the selection
> > process. So, we should fix the criteria before starting the selection
> > work. Please get ready to nominate as many good candidates as
> > possible.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > izumi
> >
> > -----------------------
> > Proposed Criteria for CS IGC Appeals Team
> >
> > A) Qualified IGC member
> > Appeals team should be Civil Society Internet Governance Caucus (CS
> > IGC) members.
> >
> > Anyone who have subscribed to the IGC Charter and subscribed to the
> > IGC caucus mailing list for 2 months prior to the announcement of the
> > appeals team Nomcom process is eligible to be a candidate. (The Nomcom
> > process started on November 20th 2006.)
> >
> > B) Qualifications
> > Nomcom will primarily select persons based on their knowledge and
> > experience of issues faced by the caucus and their neutrality.
> >
> > The successful candidate should be a person with thoughtful and
> > unbiased consideration and have a stated (and demonstrated) commitment
> > to consultation and dialogue with the community.
> >
> > C) Diversity and balance
> > Appeal Team collectively should have good diversity and balance. The
> > attributes to be considered include, but not limited to:
> >   - Geographic and cultural diversity
> >   - Gender
> >   - Age
> >   - Skill set and knowledge
> >   - Disability
> >
> > These will be treated as a goal, but not as the absolute requirement.
> >
> > D) Others
> > To avoid capture, no more than one employee/representative of a
> > particular organization should serve on the Appeal Team at any given
> > time.
> >
> > -- end --
> >
> > For your reference, the time line announced is as follows:
> >
> > 1. Discuss and agree with the criteria and selection method for Appeal
> > Team
> >   - by Jan 8
> >
> > 2. Send out "Call for Appeal Team"  - Jan 9
> >
> > 3. Receive and review applications/nominations  - Jan 21
> >
> > 4. Make final selection - Jan 29
> >
> > 5. Prepare report (Chair) - Jan 30
> >
> > 6. Announce the result - Jan 31
> >
> > 7. Publish the Report and dissolve  - Jan 31
> >
> > --
> >                       >> Izumi Aizu <<
> >
> >              Institute for HyperNetwork Society
> >              Kumon Center, Tama University
> >                              * * * * *
> >               << Writing the Future of the History >>
> >                                www.anr.org
> > ____________________________________________________________
> > You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
> >      governance at lists.cpsr.org
> > To be removed from the list, send any message to:
> >      governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
> >
> > For all list information and functions, see:
> >      http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>
> For all list information and functions, see:
>     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>


-- 
Aaron Agien Nyangkwe
Journalist/Outcome Mapper
Special Assistant To The President
ASAFE
Tel. 237 337 50 22
Fax. 237 342 29 70
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance