[governance] Re:

[David Allen]

At 4:39 PM +0100 2/3/07, Vittorio Bertola wrote:
>Adam Peake ha scritto:
>
>>(related, and I expect some caucus members might object to this, but I would like to see a sentence saying "The IGC welcomes the recognition of the Internet technical community as a fourth stakeholder in the IGF process. Information Society and the critical issues of capacity building and extending access needs the equal participation of this vital fourth stakeholder.")
>
>Well... I'd be happy to welcome it, but not if it is at the damage of our own representation. Maybe we can add it, but then add a sentence that specifies that this doesn't eliminate the need for ample representation of the "traditional" WSIS civil society folks :)

Just a note:  Suffice it that I would not support the fourth stakeholder proposal and think it is not the way forward for increased access, among other criteria for deciding how to proceed.

David
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance