[governance] Re: IG questions that are not ICANN [was: Irony]

[Suresh Ramasubramanian]

Lee McKnight wrote:

> For example, if big chunks of industry think the ITU's next generation
> networks standards will 'resolve' major parts of the cybersecurity
> puzzle, I would advise civil society to be paying attention to ITU too.
> As apparently a few individuals are doing.  And if Suresh is offering a
> way into the labyrinth, some CSers should step through. After you ; )

This is, by the way, an ITU-D BDT effort - in other words, rather different
from other work ITU may be doing on (say) standards development.

The botnet project will have several IETF / NANOG regulars coming in to
conduct hands on workshops, for example.

I am not offering a way into the "ITU labyrinth" .. don't have a ball of
string handy.  And there isn't a Minotaur waiting at the center either.

I am just pointing out some ways and means - that already exist - where civ
soc can actually participate in some initiatives that the ITU happens to be
engaged in.

Subtle difference, but it does exist, I assure you.

	srs

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance