AW: [governance] Proposal for the 23rd May IGF consultationand advisory group meeting please

[Milton Mueller]

Wolfgang:

>>> wolfgang.kleinwaechter at medienkomm.uni-halle.de 4/28/2007 5:00 PM
>>>
>I support this in<principle but would like to add an evaluation 
>of other IGOs (like ITU, WIPO, WTO, UNESCO) in the 
>evaluation. This cna be done under (1) oder under (2). It 
>would be intersting to compare the level of multistakholder 
>involvement in ICANN and  IGOs. 
 
I think this conversation would best be put under the framework of #4 -
Mandate and role of IGF. Based on my reading of Bill's description of
that, it involves an equal comparison of all the IGOs on the basis of
the WSIS principles. 

I think an exceptional approach to ICANN is justified by the fact that
ICANN is not an IGO. There are two distinct and interesting issues that
could be discussed -- its status as an international organization (e.g.,
the talk about moving it out of the US) and the changing role of the
GAC.


____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance