[governance] Proposal for the 23rd May IGF consultationand advisory group meeting please

Parminder parminder at itforchange.net
Sun Apr 29 06:57:58 EDT 2007


> Parminder:
> 
> (1) 'Global public policy on Internet - issues and institutions'
> 
> (2) ICANN - its role and processes at present, and in the emerging context
> 
> (3) Global Internet policies impacting access and effective use of
> Internet
> by disadvantage people and groups - The development agenda in IG
> 
> (4)Mandate and role of IGF
> 
> Wolfgang:
> 
> I support this in<principle but would like to add an evaluation of other
> IGOs (like ITU, WIPO, WTO, UNESCO) in the evaluation. This cna be done
> under (1) oder under (2). It would be intersting to compare the level of
> multistakholder involvement in ICANN and  IGOs.
> 
>

Sure, makes sense to do it in (1) since it speaks of global public policy
institutions, though in comparative terms these can be evoked in (2) as
well. Parminder  

________________________________________________
Parminder Jeet Singh
IT for Change, Bangalore
Bridging Development Realities and Technological Possibilities 
Tel: (+91-80) 2665 4134, 2653 6890
Fax: (+91-80) 4146 1055
www.ITforChange.net 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kleinwächter, Wolfgang
> [mailto:wolfgang.kleinwaechter at medienkomm.uni-halle.de]
> Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2007 2:31 AM
> To: governance at lists.cpsr.org; Parminder; governance at lists.cpsr.org;
> William Drake
> Subject: AW: [governance] Proposal for the 23rd May IGF consultationand
> advisory group meeting please
> 
> Parminder:
> 
> (1) 'Global public policy on Internet - issues and institutions'
> 
> (2) ICANN - its role and processes at present, and in the emerging context
> 
> (3) Global Internet policies impacting access and effective use of
> Internet
> by disadvantage people and groups - The development agenda in IG
> 
> (4)Mandate and role of IGF
> 
> Wolfgang:
> 
> I support this in<principle but would like to add an evaluation of other
> IGOs (like ITU, WIPO, WTO, UNESCO) in the evaluation. This cna be done
> under (1) oder under (2). It would be intersting to compare the level of
> multistakholder involvement in ICANN and  IGOs.
> 
> 

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance



More information about the Governance mailing list