[governance] .xxx. igc and igf

[Vittorio Bertola]

Parminder ha scritto:
> Before addressing your question

But please do...

> Since when have we begun to take note of resistance of any organization
> before discussing it at IGF or elsewhere.

Oh well, mine was just a honest opinion. You are free to ignore any 
resistance and discuss future arrangements for ICANN at the IGF. 
However, unless the scenario changes and a certain number of governments 
(the same ones that acted so that the "enhanced cooperation" was agreed 
in Tunis as a separate process than the IGF) recognize the IGF as a 
venue for that discussion, whatever is held there will just be a moment 
of entertainment among ourselves. In the meantime, a number of 
discussions are already going on at ICANN, so chances are that by the 
time you finally have that discussion at the IGF, ICANN will already 
have devised plans of its own for its revised institutional 
arrangements. This is why I thought to suggest you to show up at the 
President's Strategy Committee sessions at ICANN meetings instead - I 
think that it might be a more effective way to contribute to that 
discussion.
-- 
vb.                   Vittorio Bertola - vb [a] bertola.eu   <--------
-------->  finally with a new website at http://bertola.eu/  <--------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance