[governance] Where are we going?

[Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law]

But why, in this case, is that position (whether "ultra-liberal" or as I 
would say, rather conservative) a bad one?  Isn't decentralized decision 
making (subsidiarity) a Good Thing in this (and most) cases?

On Sun, 8 Apr 2007, Raul Echeberria wrote:

> At 11:56 a.m. 08/04/2007, Milton Mueller wrote:
>> Izumi:
>> You said:
>> 
>> "...a [new GTLD proposal] should be put in place
>> only when there is a strong consensus by the community."
>> 
>> Please conduct the following thought experiment. Substitute for the
>> word "new gTLD proposal" any other internet business in your statement.
>> Then you will understand why I am horrified by the attitude you are
>> expressing.
>
>
> It is very consistent with your ultra liberal position.
> Nobody can say that you are not coherent.
>
>
> Raúl
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>    governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>    governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>
> For all list information and functions, see:
>    http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>

-- 
http://www.icannwatch.org   Personal Blog: http://www.discourse.net
A. Michael Froomkin   |    Professor of Law    |   froomkin at law.tm
U. Miami School of Law, P.O. Box 248087, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
+1 (305) 284-4285  |  +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax)  |  http://www.law.tm
                        -->It's warm here.<--____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance