[governance] Where are we going?

[Robin Gross]

I don't understand what is meant below by "ultra liberal" but it seems 
to imply "extreme".  

But the more "radical" view, in my opinion, is that one community should 
be able to prevent the lawful speech of another community.  That is the 
position which blatantly diverts from centuries of freedom of expression 
jurisprudence, most notably Art. 19 of the UN Universal Declaration of 
Human Rights (and national protections like the US Constitution). 

Why should legal standards for freedom of expression be violated in the 
ICANN context?

Robin


Raul Echeberria wrote:

> At 11:56 a.m. 08/04/2007, Milton Mueller wrote:
>
>> Izumi:
>> You said:
>>
>> "...a [new GTLD proposal] should be put in place
>> only when there is a strong consensus by the community."
>>
>> Please conduct the following thought experiment. Substitute for the
>> word "new gTLD proposal" any other internet business in your statement.
>> Then you will understand why I am horrified by the attitude you are
>> expressing.
>
>
>
> It is very consistent with your ultra liberal position.
> Nobody can say that you are not coherent.
>
>
> Raúl
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>
> For all list information and functions, see:
>     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>
>

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance