[governance] the continuing NN debate

[Lee McKnight]

Hey, just have a sec, so will not make a positivist argument just yet. A
few replies:


> The first I don't know, while the second is highly dubious.

Even if it doesn't "work like a typical un convention", what
reason is there to assume that the text would be drafted by
means of a fair and transparent multistakeholder process?

Lee: So now you assume a framework convention would draft text this
decade? : )  Doubt it seriously if CS doesn;t play, and even if it
does.

> On the other hand specific regulatory intervention soon is Ok you
> say...so which path gets governments involved deeper and earlier?
When
> we haven't yet agreed what the subject of the regulations is?

What I'm proposing is to work on whatever can be done by means
of transparent and accountable multistakeholder processes.

Lee: cool, we agree



Prof. Lee W. McKnight
School of Information Studies
Syracuse University
+1-315-443-6891office
+1-315-278-4392 mobile
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance