[governance] GigaNet Symposium in Athens

[William Drake]

Please distribute as appropriate
 
Final Program
 
Global Internet Governance Academic Network (GigaNet)
First Annual Symposium
www.intgovforum.org/IGF_Platform.php
 
Divani Apollon Palace & Spa Hotel
Athens, Greece
Room: TBA
 
29 October 2006 
 
The Global Internet Governance Academic Network (GigaNet) is an emerging
scholarly community initiated in Spring 2006.  Its four principal objectives
are to: support the establishment of a global cohort of scholars
specializing on Internet governance issues; promote the development of
Internet governance as a recognized, interdisciplinary field of study;
advance theoretical and applied research on Internet governance, broadly
defined; and facilitate informed dialogue on policy issues and related
matters between scholars and Internet governance stakeholders (governments,
international organizations, the private sector, and civil society). In this
context, the GigaNet plans to organize symposia to be held on site prior to
the annual meetings of the Internet Governance Forum (IGF). This event is
the first in that series.
 

9:30-9:45    Welcome and Overview
 
Wolfgang Kleinwächter, Professor of International Communication Policy and
Regulation, University of Aarhus; Denmark
 

9:45-11:15 Theorizing Internet Governance: The State of the Art
 
Chair:    
 
Peng Hwa Ang, Dean, School of Communication and Information, Nanyang
Technological University, and Director, Singapore Internet Research Center;
Singapore
 
Panelists:
 
“The Need For Interdisciplinary Understanding”
Mary Rundle, Director, Net Dialogue, and Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet
and Society at Harvard University and the Center for Internet and Society at
Stanford University; USA
 
“Cross-national Collaboration on Internet Governance: Critical Success
Factors for Cross-Disciplinary and Cross-Cultural Studies”
Nanette S. Levinson, Associate Professor of International Relations,
American University; Washington DC, USA
 
“The Role of the State in Heterogeneous Governance Arrangements”
Jeanette Hoffman, Research Fellow, Social Science Research Center, and
Partner, the Internet Governance Project; Berlin, Germany
 
“An Economic Rationale for Internet Regulation”
Filomena Chirico, Post-doc Researcher, Tilburg Center for Law and Economics,
Tilburg University; The Netherlands
 
“Hybrid Regimes, Power, and Legitimacy in Global Governance: 
Insights from
Internet Privacy Regulation”
Ralf Bendrath, Research Fellow, University of
Bremen; Germany
 
Focus:
 
In recent years, scholars have begun to analyze Internet governance issues
using the theoretical tools of their respective academic disciplines.  While
issues surrounding ICANN have attracted particular attention, there also has
been significant work done on the international governance of digital
international trade and intellectual property, privacy, security, speech,
and other topics.  Such research often has been rather specialized and
geared toward the distinct audiences interested in each issue-area, which
limited intellectual cross-fertilization. These topics are related, and
Internet governance should be seen as a broad but coherent field of study
that merits elaboration and support.  Mapping the landscape of relevant
theoretical perspectives is an important first step toward this end.
 
The purpose of this panel is to consider questions such as: What aspects of
Internet governance are uniquely interesting and worthy of scholarly
analysis?  How has Internet governance been addressed by scholars in the
social sciences, humanities, law, and other disciplines, and which
theoretical approaches seem to be the most promising for which issues and
dynamics?  Do these efforts point to the emergence of a coherent research
agenda and the cumulative development of new knowledge? Are there
barriers—intellectual, institutional, and other—that might have to be
overcome to advance that agenda? How can Internet governance develop into an
interdisciplinary scholarly field that is taken seriously by academics and
also capable of providing useful inputs to the Internet Governance Forum and
other policy development institutions?  What lessons can be learned, if any,
from other fields defined by the object of inquiry/dependent variables
rather than by shared theories and independent variables, e.g.,
“communication studies,” “information studies,” and “women's studies”? Are
there national or cultural differences in the ways scholars approach these
matters, and if so how might these be reconciled?
 
 
11:15-11:30 Coffee break
 
 
11:30-13:00 “Enhanced Cooperation” and Interaction among Stakeholders in
Internet Governance
 
Chair:   
 
Milton Mueller, Professor of Information Studies, Syracuse University, and
Partner, the Internet Governance Project
 
Panelists:
 
“A European Perspective on Enhanced Cooperation”
Bernard Benhamou, Senior Lecturer for the Information Society, National
Foundation of Political Science; Paris, France
 
“‘The Sovereign Right of States:’ Why Multi-Stakeholder Policy Development
is Possible
and Necessary”
Jeremy Malcolm, Doctoral candidate, Murdoch University; Perth, Australia
 
“Distributed Internet Governance: A Chance or a Threat to Democracy?”
Meryem Marzouki, Researcher, National Center for Scientific Research, and
Computer Science
Laboratory of the University Paris 6; France
 
“The Future of Enhanced Cooperation”
Wolfgang Kleinwächter, Professor of International Communication Policy and
Regulation, University of Aarhus; Denmark
 
Focus:
 
In addition to creating the Internet Governance Forum, the Tunis Agenda
calls for “enhanced cooperation” among governments. This language originated
with the European Union's June 2005 criticism of US unilateral control of
ICANN. The EU claimed that the WSIS statement constituted, “a worldwide
political agreement providing for further internationalization of Internet
governance, and enhanced intergovernmental cooperation to this end” and
that, “Such cooperation should include the development of globally
applicable principles on public policy issues associated with the
coordination and management of critical Internet resources.”
 
The purpose of this panel is to consider questions such as: What are the
causes of US-EU tensions over Internet governance? What institutional form
might such a “new cooperation model” for deliberations among governments
take? How viable is the distinction between “day-to-day management of the
Internet and “public policy?” What, more generally, is the role of national
governments in Internet governance in relation to other stakeholder groups?
What implications might “enhanced cooperation” have for civil society and
multistakeholder participation? How might such a philosophy lead to changes
in the structure or processes of ICANN?
 
 
13:00-14:30  Lunch break (on your own)
 
 
14:30-16:00 The Distributed Architecture of Internet Governance
 
Chair:    
 
William J. Drake, Director, Project on the Information Revolution and Global
Governance, Graduate Institute of International Studies; Geneva, Switzerland
 
Panelists:
 
“The Role of International Telecommunications Arrangements in Distributed
Internet Governance”
Don MacLean, Independent consultant (formerly Chief of Strategic Planning
and External Affairs, the International Telecommunication Union); Ottawa,
Canada
 
“Institutional Factors Impacting Participation in Distributed Internet
Governance”
David Souter, Visiting Professor in Communications Management (formerly
Chief Executive, Commonwealth Telecommunications Organization); University
of Strathclyde, United Kingdom
 
“Striking a Balance in Guiding Principles for Distributed Internet
Governance” 
Qiheng Hu, President of the Internet Society of China and Chairperson of the
Steering Committee for the China Network and Information Center (formerly
Vice President, Chinese Academy of Sciences); Beijing, China
 
“Best Practices for Internet Standards Governance?”
Laura DeNardis, Visiting Fellow, Yale Law School Information Society
Project; New Haven, USA
 
Focus:
 
 As the WSIS agreements recognized, Internet governance involves much more
than ICANN or the collective management of naming and numbering. Internet
governance also includes the development and application of internationally
shared principles, norms, rules, decision-making procedures, and programs in
a variety of other issue-areas, e.g. technical standardization, cybercrime
and network security, international interconnection, e-commerce,
e-contracting, networked trade in digital goods and services, digital
intellectual property, jurisdiction and choice of law, human rights, speech
and social conduct, cultural and linguistic diversity, privacy and consumer
protection, dispute resolution, and so on. These activities take a variety
of forms and are pursued in a heterogeneous array of settings, including
governmental, intergovernmental, private sector, and multistakeholder
organizations and collaborations. In parallel, the international regimes and
related frameworks they establish vary widely in their institutional
attributes, e.g. the collective action problems addressed, functions
performed, participants involved, organizational setting and decision making
procedures, agreement type, strength and scope of prescriptions, compliance
mechanisms, power dynamics and distributional biases, etc.  But while there
is now broad recognition that the architecture of Internet governance is
highly distributed, there has been little systematic scholarly analysis or
policy dialogue about its precise nature and implications.
 
The purpose of this panel is to explore and clarify some of the lingering
ambiguities, including questions such as: Which governance mechanisms are
relatively more or less important in shaping the Internet¹s evolution and
use?  How well do these mechanisms cohere, and are there tensions and gaps
between them? Are there crosscutting issues that merit consideration from
analytical and programmatic standpoints?  Are there generalizable lessons to
be learned by the distinct communities of expertise involved in different
issue-areas with regard to best practices and institutional design?  Does
the distributed architecture pose any challenges with respect to the
effective participation of less powerful stakeholders and the global
community¹s ability to govern in an effective and equitable manner?  Looking
beyond formalized collective frameworks, under what circumstances, if any,
may private market power or spontaneously harmonized practices constitute
forms of Internet governance? What is the current role of governance
mechanisms for international telecommunications, and what might that role
become in a future marked by convergence and potentially non-neutral next
generation networks?
 
 
16:00-16:15 Closing of the Symposium
 
 
16:15-16:30 Coffee break
 
 
16:30-18:00 GigaNet Business Meeting  (Open to current and prospective
GigaNet members)
 

*******************************************************
William J. Drake  drake at hei.unige.ch
Director, Project on the Information
  Revolution and Global Governance
  Graduate Institute for International Studies
  Geneva, Switzerland
http://www.cpsr.org/Members/wdrake
*******************************************************


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20061009/14325a7f/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: message-footer.txt
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20061009/14325a7f/attachment.txt>