[governance] Caucus Statement: another proposal

[Vittorio Bertola]

klohento at panos-ao.org ha scritto:
> Just to make a small correction:

Apologies, I must confess that I missed that. That makes things somewhat 
better, though it does not solve my concerns on that point completely.

> Another reality is that the IGC caucus (even though the most relevant from
> a thematic point of view) is not the only CS grouping that can send
> nominations...

This is another point that we should discuss with all other CS 
groupings. We should find a way to work together at least on these 
procedural points, otherwise, if we stand divided, it will be easier to 
ignore even the (many) points on which we agree. For example, 
appointment of delegates should be something on which we should find a 
way to have just one inclusive process whose outcome is acknowledged by 
all civil society groups. It might come with time, if we work to that 
effect.

On the other hand, diversity is never bad, so there's nothing wrong in 
putting forward multiple suggestions either. I just think that this 
makes it easier to ignore them all altogether.
-- 
vb.             [Vittorio Bertola - v.bertola [a] bertola.eu.org]<-----
http://bertola.eu.org/  <- Prima o poi...
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance