[governance] Dynamic Coalition on IGF Fund, with focus on participation from developing parts of the world

[Jeremy Shtern]

Nyangkwe Agien Aaron wrote:
> I do not think that the idea of a "Dynamic coalition" has to do with
> some trade unionism or some political coalitions what soever, as
> Jeremy is wont to fear, from his intervention, if I read well between
> the lines.
++++  Thanks Adam and Nyangkwe, but, just to be clear, if this quote 
above refers to my inquiry below, it had never occurred to me to 
associate this term with trade unionism and I wasn't really trying to 
read between the lines- just curious as to when we started using this 
(WSIS, pre-IGF, during IGF etc) and where it came from (CS, MAG, one of 
the consultation documents etc). If, as you seem to suggest Nyangkwe, it 
has a historical association from way outside the IG debates or the 
recent thinking about multi-stakeholder governance that invokes trade 
unionism or anything else- I would like to know more and maybe we can 
get Nitin to reflect on what one has to do with the other.

Cheers,

Jeremy


> All I seem to understand is that Izumi's dynamism is being put on the
> table for some other dynamic people to coalese so as to ascertain an
> inclusive participation of all and sundry at the IGF.
> Izumis "coalition" is no trade union against some status quo, far from
> that. It is just one big idea to get more participation from
> developing countries in the IGF. Echos from Athens proof that, the
> participation was not inclusive enough.
>
> The term "dynamic coalition" should scare no one. It calls for more
> dynamism if we want an inclusive participation in the on- going IGF
> process.
>
> Nyangkwe
>
>
> On 11/2/06, Jeremy Shtern <jeremy.shtern at umontreal.ca> wrote:
>> Does anyone have any idea where the term 'dynamic colalitions'  has come
>> from, how it entered into the IGF process etc? Adam? Anyone else?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Jeremy
>>
>>
>> Izumi AIZU wrote:
>> > Friends,
>> >
>> > I said the following in the morning open mike session this morning at
>> > IGF, for the record, and invite you to join this, give advice, or take
>> > on board and make it better.
>> >
>> > Several person mostly engaged in ITC4D areas personally responded to
>> > join this.
>> >
>> > I like to ask CS members of Advisory Committee to bring this to their
>> > attention in an appropriate manner.
>> >
>> > Please remind and push me in the near future.
>> >
>> > izumi
>> >
>> > A proposal for Dynamic Coalition on IGF Funding with a focus on
>> > Participation and Development
>> >
>> > Izumi Aizu, A member of ALAC, ICANN
>> >
>> > Here is an ad hoc proposal:
>> >
>> > One of the differences we observe between Tunis Summit and IGF here in
>> > Athens I observe is less number of participants from the developing
>> > countries. Even though the overarching single theme of this IGF is IG
>> > for Development. So, I like to submit an Ad Hoc Proposal to form a
>> > Dynamic Coalition on Funding of IGF, with a special focus on
>> > supporting the participation of developing parts of the world. This
>> > includes, of course,  developing countries, but perhaps also such
>> > relatively marginalized people or those having higher barriers for
>> > participation as persons with disabilities, youth and many NGOs and
>> > Civil Society people mostly in developing countries, but sometimes to
>> > those even in developed country, but in say rural areas etc.
>> >
>> > I think that early effort should be made for this program.
>> >
>> > We call on governments of the North, donor countries, international
>> > organizations in charge of development, and IG related bodies such as
>> > ICANN, ITU, WIPO or any others to provide adequate funding to bring
>> > more people from developing countries – to next IGF meeting in Brazil.
>> >
>> > A number of individuals mostly within the Civil Society group and IG
>> > Caucus expressed their interest to act as conduit, or function as
>> > facilitators to implement these funds into tangible programs, working
>> > together with the IGF secretariat, host government of Brazil and IGF
>> > Advisory Group members. Again, we appeal to those government and
>> > international organizations who are interested in allocating some of
>> > your small budget for the next year 2007 and onward, ITU, ICANN, World
>> > Bank, or private sector bodies such as Keidanren, ICC or big or small
>> > companies such as Microsoft, Siemens, Amazon or Google, France
>> > Telecom, BT, NTT, T-Mobile, Orange… just to name a few – and we will
>> > commit to make best use of the funding.
>> > ____________________________________________________________
>> > You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>> >     governance at lists.cpsr.org
>> > To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>> >     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>> >
>> > For all list information and functions, see:
>> >     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>> >
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>     governance at lists.cpsr.org
>> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>>     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>>
>> For all list information and functions, see:
>>     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>>
>
>
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance