[governance] Dynamic Coalition on IGF Fund, with focus on participation from developing parts of the world

[John Mathiason]

To give credit where credit may be due, Bill Drake used the term in  
his presentation to the panel on a Framework Convention.  You might  
ask him where he got it.

John
On Nov 2, 2006, at 6:15 PM, Adam Peake wrote:

> I'm not sure, but Nitin Desai seems to like what it conveys and it's
> become a bit of a meme.
>
> I think I remember Matthew Shears using "dynamic coalition" in an off
> the cuff comment during an early IGF consultation.  Matthew denies all
> knowledge and responsibility :-)
>
> Adam
>
>
>
> On 11/3/06, Jeremy Shtern <jeremy.shtern at umontreal.ca> wrote:
>> Does anyone have any idea where the term 'dynamic colalitions'   
>> has come
>> from, how it entered into the IGF process etc? Adam? Anyone else?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Jeremy
>>
>>
>> Izumi AIZU wrote:
>> > Friends,
>> >
>> > I said the following in the morning open mike session this  
>> morning at
>> > IGF, for the record, and invite you to join this, give advice,  
>> or take
>> > on board and make it better.
>> >
>> > Several person mostly engaged in ITC4D areas personally  
>> responded to
>> > join this.
>> >
>> > I like to ask CS members of Advisory Committee to bring this to  
>> their
>> > attention in an appropriate manner.
>> >
>> > Please remind and push me in the near future.
>> >
>> > izumi
>> >
>> > A proposal for Dynamic Coalition on IGF Funding with a focus on
>> > Participation and Development
>> >
>> > Izumi Aizu, A member of ALAC, ICANN
>> >
>> > Here is an ad hoc proposal:
>> >
>> > One of the differences we observe between Tunis Summit and IGF  
>> here in
>> > Athens I observe is less number of participants from the developing
>> > countries. Even though the overarching single theme of this IGF  
>> is IG
>> > for Development. So, I like to submit an Ad Hoc Proposal to form a
>> > Dynamic Coalition on Funding of IGF, with a special focus on
>> > supporting the participation of developing parts of the world. This
>> > includes, of course,  developing countries, but perhaps also such
>> > relatively marginalized people or those having higher barriers for
>> > participation as persons with disabilities, youth and many NGOs and
>> > Civil Society people mostly in developing countries, but  
>> sometimes to
>> > those even in developed country, but in say rural areas etc.
>> >
>> > I think that early effort should be made for this program.
>> >
>> > We call on governments of the North, donor countries, international
>> > organizations in charge of development, and IG related bodies  
>> such as
>> > ICANN, ITU, WIPO or any others to provide adequate funding to bring
>> > more people from developing countries – to next IGF meeting in  
>> Brazil.
>> >
>> > A number of individuals mostly within the Civil Society group  
>> and IG
>> > Caucus expressed their interest to act as conduit, or function as
>> > facilitators to implement these funds into tangible programs,  
>> working
>> > together with the IGF secretariat, host government of Brazil and  
>> IGF
>> > Advisory Group members. Again, we appeal to those government and
>> > international organizations who are interested in allocating  
>> some of
>> > your small budget for the next year 2007 and onward, ITU, ICANN,  
>> World
>> > Bank, or private sector bodies such as Keidanren, ICC or big or  
>> small
>> > companies such as Microsoft, Siemens, Amazon or Google, France
>> > Telecom, BT, NTT, T-Mobile, Orange… just to name a few – and we  
>> will
>> > commit to make best use of the funding.
>> > ____________________________________________________________
>> > You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>> >     governance at lists.cpsr.org
>> > To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>> >     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>> >
>> > For all list information and functions, see:
>> >     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>> >
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>      governance at lists.cpsr.org
>> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>>      governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>>
>> For all list information and functions, see:
>>      http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>
> For all list information and functions, see:
>     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance