[governance] Going forward - Role of the governance caucus [3 options]

[Meryem Marzouki]

Le 6 mars 06 à 18:07, McTim a écrit :
>
> On 3/6/06, Meryem Marzouki <marzouki at ras.eu.org > wrote: Hi all,
>
>
> Finally, to comment on Bill's options, I think his 'status quo'
> option, which seems to gain the larger - expressed - preference,
> doesn't include the key role of nominating CS people to the IGF (I
> mean further to people nominated on behalf of this specific caucus).
> I think Bill is right on this.
>
>
> Why would ppl need to be nominated to the IGF? It's the IGF PC (or  
> whatever) that folk may need to be nominated for.

That's right. But there will be for sure people to be nominated at  
some session or round-table (or any other restricted opportunity to  
speak), in more formalized venues than the IGF consultation meeting.  
It frequently happens..
_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
governance at lists.cpsr.org
https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance