[governance] Caucus

[karen banks]

hi

i understand the MMWG's objectives and difference with the caucus as 
avri describes..

maybe the end march call for ideas on issues, is a good chance for 
the governance caucus to think about how it can 
lead/facilitate  broad CS input on this question..

personally, i think the caucus needs to go out to broader civil 
society, and not the other way around, in the post WSIS implementation phase..

karen

At 22:33 02/03/2006, David Allen wrote:
>At 9:13 PM +0100 3/2/06, Avri Doria wrote:
> >hi,
> >
> >i thought the difference was:
> >
> >- MMWG - focuses on modalities, and only on modalities, in the IGF
> >and Follow up and Implementation mechanisms.  mmwg is open to all
> >individuals and not just civil society and is meant as a
> >multistakeholder group.
> >
> >- IGC - focuses on all things IG as it wishes.  including modalities
> >if it feels like it.  the IGC is, to my understanding, meant to be a
> >civil society group - even though it has an open list.
> >
> >
> >the mmwg, as originally conceived, if i may be so bold, was not meant
> >to take anything away from the caucus, just a means to have a place
> >where people who like talking process, and more process, and possibly
> >even more process, have a place to talk process all the time without
> >blotting out talk on substantive topics.
> >
> >a.
>
>This seems to me just about exactly right.
>
>David
>_______________________________________________
>governance mailing list
>governance at lists.cpsr.org
>https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance


_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
governance at lists.cpsr.org
https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance