[governance] Caucus

[Avri Doria]

hi,

i thought the difference was:

- MMWG - focuses on modalities, and only on modalities, in the IGF  
and Follow up and Implementation mechanisms.  mmwg is open to all  
individuals and not just civil society and is meant as a  
multistakeholder group.

- IGC - focuses on all things IG as it wishes.  including modalities  
if it feels like it.  the IGC is, to my understanding, meant to be a  
civil society group - even though it has an open list.


the mmwg, as originally conceived, if i may be so bold, was not meant  
to take anything away from the caucus, just a means to have a place  
where people who like talking process, and more process, and possibly  
even more process, have a place to talk process all the time without  
blotting out talk on substantive topics.

a.

On 2 mar 2006, at 20.35, Wolfgang Kleinwächter wrote:

> 2. To serve as a space for discussion of how CS would intervene in  
> IGF processes.
>
> in principle yes, but we have to avoid overlapping with the MMWG.  
> Probably it will not be easy in practice to explain the differences  
> between the old caucus and the MMWG. When I explained it to Markus,  
> he was a little bit confused, and so will others :-(((.
>
> Best
>
> wolfgang
>
> _______________________________________________
> governance mailing list
> governance at lists.cpsr.org
> https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance
>


_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
governance at lists.cpsr.org
https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance