[governance] ICANN's strategy for the future

[Avri Doria]

<personal opinion>

Hi,


On 22 jul 2006, at 04.39, Vittorio Bertola wrote:

>  but it never came to my mind that the IGC "as itself" could want  
> to participate in ICANN consultations; it never did in the past (I  
> presume it is also because most of us are already directly involved  
> in ICANN through other groups and constituencies).


As I tried to say in my note, I don't think, especially at this  
point, that the IGC per-se will have a statement to make (it would  
surprise me).  but I think there are many individuals on the IGC that  
might.  One of the values of the IGC, in addition to any cooperative  
actions we may take, is to serve as a informational point for  
activities that may be of interest to participants (a category i  
think includes both meta-members, those who plan to vote on the  
charter, and others on the list).

So as a participant who noticed it, and thought it might be  
interesting to others, i passed it on.

a.

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance