[governance] statement for ITU website
Veni Markovski
veni at veni.com
Mon Jan 30 10:31:22 EST 2006
Bill Drake,
<http://www.isoc.bg/index_en.html>Internet Society - Bulgaria signs.
veni
www.isoc.bg/ig - the Internet Governance Resource Portal
At 16:06 30-01-06 +0100, William Drake wrote:
>Hi,
>
>So far I have as signatories,
>
>William Drake Computer
>Professionals for Social Responsibility/
>
>Graduate Institute for International Studies
>Wolfgang KleinwДchter University of Aarhus
>McTim Internet Infrastructure Consultant
>Lee McKnight Syracuse
>University/Internet Governance Project
>Parminder Jeet Singh IT for Change
>Jeanette Hofmann Social Science Research Center, Berlin
>Avri Doria Computer
>Professionals for Social Responsibility/Consultant
>
>Questions:
>
>1. Parminder thinks we should have some sort of
>WSIS-related identification. I'm not much on a
>lead like 'we the people of WSIS-CS' or whatever
>since it implies a level of consultation and
>consensus that isn't there, but I suppose I
>could label it, Statement by Members of the
>WSIS-Civil Society Internet Governance
>Caucus. Any problems with that? Of course, I'd
>rather it was simply a statement of the caucus,
>full stop, can't imagine that many caucus
>members are opposed to asking for inclusion, and
>we've made caucus statements in the past with
>fewer ayes (an issue in itself, I suppose), but
>maybe that's pushing it a bit...Anyone have
>guidance/feelings about this either way?
>
>2. Avri suggested I frame this in terms of
>"civil society organizations and academics." I
>view academia as part of CS by definition, but
>can do this for emphasis, in which case perhaps
>I should stick Dr. in front of the relevant
>names. With ITU, where claims of 'expertise'
>are highly relevant to a claim to participation,
>this might be desirable. Guidance/feelings...?
>
>I guess I can send this later in the evening to
>give more time in case others want to sign on,
>I'll just email it directly to relevant staff to
>make sure it gets seen before the meeting.
>
>Best,
>
>Bill
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Parminder [mailto:parminder at itforchange.net]
>Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 3:25 PM
>To: 'William Drake'; 'Governance'
>Subject: RE: [governance] statement for ITU website
>
>Hi Bill
>
>
>Pl add IT for Change▓s endorsement to it. Thanks.
>
>I still find it astonishing that ITU can get
>away with not incorporating open access
>principle which is clearly stated in POA, and
>more clearly so for the kind of work ITU does √ technical IS related info┘.
>
>I am in the middle of something urgent, and not
>able to draft a separate ▒open access▓
>statement▓ √ so well, some other time. Though I
>also see that there could be some lack of
>complete consensus on this issue in the CS √ it
>is certainly is a complex issue┘┘
>
>For me making such representations is important
>not only from a content point of view √ which is
>of course more important √ but as much from
>process point of view. We need to take
>opportunity at these times when the WSIS-CS
>mandate, structure and future is uncertain to
>asset ourselves as the ▒WSIS CS▓ or something.
>We have gathered some political strength in our
>collective form, however rudimentary. It needs
>to be preserved √ and it can only be preserved
>by pushing ▒content▓ or substantive actions like this one┘┘
>
>That was the reason I had used the rather
>artificial sounding opening for the statement I
>drafted √ ▒We, the CS that associated with the
>WSIS▓. See if some acceptable version of such
>assertion can be used┘┘ It will be politically
>significant┘.. though we need to figure out how
>much active the WSIS CS is at present┘. More on that later┘.
>
>Thanks for the effort┘
>
>Best regards
>
>Parminder
>
>
>________________________________________________
>Parminder Jeet Singh
>IT for Change
>Bridging Development Realities and Technological Possibilities
>91-80-26654134
><http://www.itforchange.net/>www.ITforChange.net
>
>----------
>From: governance-bounces at lists.cpsr.org
>[mailto:governance-bounces at lists.cpsr.org] On Behalf Of William Drake
>Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 3:05 PM
>To: Governance
>Subject: [governance] statement for ITU website
>
>Good morning,
>
>Since there was no consensus on making a joint
>caucus or other CS statement on the website for
>the ITU's Wednesday reform meeting, I decided I
>might as well type up something short to submit
>on a personal basis. If anyone would like to
>sign on you're more than welcome; either way, I
>will submit this by close of business today,
>Geneva time. I don't know that we'd have time
>to do any text tweaking, but if that might make
>this more attractive to potential signatories,
>let's communicate. I see that Parminder made a
>nice submission on the cost of ITU documentation
>and its nonconformity with the access to
>knowledge and information principle enunciated
>in the WSIS Plan of Action. The below text is
>on a different point and is complementary.
>
>-------
>
>The WSIS Principles state that Internet
>governance should be multilateral, transparent
>and democratic, with the full involvement of
>governments, the private sector, civil society
>and international organizations. The ITU
>clearly does not meet the last criteria. For
>the overwhelming majority of civil society
>organizations, the barriers to becoming a sector
>member or even an associate are simply too
>high. In parallel, there are no options for
>participating on a more flexible, ad hoc basis
>in special workshops and seminars, or in the
>assemblies and conferences. In consequence, and
>unlike other UN agencies, true NGOs (as opposed
>to hybrid business/user/technical organizations)
>are almost entirely absent and alienated from
>the ITU. That this is not in the ITU▓s own
>interest was amply demonstrated by the WSIS
>process, in which civil society strongly opposed
>the ITU playing an expanded, leading role in Internet governance.
>
>With WSIS follow-up and implementation efforts
>forthcoming, now would be a particularly
>appropriate time to make opening up to civil
>society a central element of ITU reform. Doing
>so would not in any way disrupt the work of the
>Union, and the administrative cost would be
>negligible (we can print our own documents,
>etc). The ITU would not face a stampede of
>hundreds of organizations seeking to participate
>in ongoing study group work on frequency
>propagation, signaling requirements and
>protocols, and other technical matters. A much
>more likely scenario would be that a manageable
>number of NGOs would seek to participate in some
>of the above-mentioned workshops, seminars,
>assemblies and conferences. Civil society
>experts contributed significantly to the success
>of the February 2004 ITU workshop on Internet
>governance, and there is every reason to believe
>that same constructive engagement would ensue in
>other forums. Allowing civil society
>participation in events like the March 2006
>meeting on NGN policies would be a good first
>step, and would not require changes to the
>Constitution and Convention. WSIS and/or ECOSOC
>accreditation would seem sufficient for this purpose.
>
>It is unfortunate that the ITU▓s February 1
>reform meeting is closed to civil society
>participation. Our exclusion from this and
>similar events has been debated extensively on
>civil society Internet listservs in the course
>of the WSIS process and afterwards. There was
>little enthusiasm for the website▓s cheery
>invitation to ⌠be part of it■ by submitting
>statements in this ⌠open forum■ for a meeting
>from which we are barred. If however the ITU
>were to initiate a genuine, open and inclusive
>dialogue on the matter, the response would be rather different.
>
>---------
>
>Best,
>
>Bill
>
>*******************************************************
>William J. Drake <mailto:drake at hei.unige.ch>drake at hei.unige.ch
>Director, Project on the Information
> Revolution and Global Governance
> Graduate Institute for International Studies
> Geneva, Switzerland
>President, Computer Professionals for
> Social Responsibility
><http://www.cpsr.org/board/drake>http://www.cpsr.org/board/drake
>*******************************************************
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>governance mailing list
>governance at lists.cpsr.org
>https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20060130/fb15175e/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
governance at lists.cpsr.org
https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance
More information about the Governance
mailing list