[governance] draft for a caucus intervention for Geneva

[Jeanette Hofmann]

thanks Wolfgang and Karen.
It would be good if you or anybody else could suggest concrete language 
that can easily be added. Hope to be online later today.
jeanette


karen banks wrote:
> hi
> 
> i've looked over very quickly and can support everything here - we would 
> have additional points to make, or would emphasize some points more than 
> others, but can do so in a separate intervention.
> 
> the two points i would add, or, think are missing - are the importance 
> of a rights based approach to the forum (with specific reference to 
> privacy and freedom of expression) and the importance of an overriding 
> development orientation to the work of the IGF (i don't see any 
> reference to developing country priorities in this text, excepting that 
> of capacity building and participation - which are of course important, 
> but nothing that indicates issue focus/priority)
> 
> anyway, if this is too difficult - i can raise in our intervention..
> 
> APC will post it's survey response today, very late.. and i'll post a 
> copy here..
> 
> In some ways, we are still thinking, so the responses are not 
> necessarily final final positions or perspectives ..
> 
> karen
> 
> At 22:48 14/02/2006, Jeanette Hofmann wrote:
> 
>> Hi, here comes attached and below, and as usual very late, a potential 
>> caucus statement. Jeremy helped drafting it.
>>
>> *Please let us know if the text is acceptable or which parts need 
>> further editing or should be deleted because they are controversial.
>>
>> *The text is still a bit long. Suggestions for shortening are welcome 
>> too.
>>
>> Since I am travelling tomorrow, it would be good if somebody - perhaps 
>> somebody already in Geneva? Bill? - took over the editing function.
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------
>>
>> I Founding principles for the Forum on Internet Governance
>>
>>
>> •       Added Value: The goal of the forum is to add value to the 
>> existing institutional arrangements relevant to Internet governance by 
>> extending participation to a broader community and by improving the 
>> quality of dialogue, discussion and development in this field.
>>
>> •       Capacity-building: The IGF must contribute to building 
>> capacity in Internet governance amongst all stakeholders directly 
>> engaged in Internet Governance and ICT policy issues as well as within 
>> the wider communities affected by them. The IGF must overcome the 
>> specific barriers to effective participation, in particular from 
>> developing countries, found in the current institutional structures of 
>> Internet Governance.
>>
>> •       Multi-stakeholder approach and openness: The forum must be 
>> open to the participation of all relevant actors from all sectors and 
>> regions including governments, private sector, civil society and 
>> international organizations. The multi-stakeholder approach should not 
>> only be applied to the forum but to all bodies and processes related 
>> to the forum such as the secretariat and a potential program committee.
>>
>> •       Inclusiveness and remote participation: Physical attendance 
>> should not be required for participation. In order to strengthen the 
>> inclusiveness of its collaboration, the forum should integrate new 
>> forms of remote participation to enable contributions from 
>> stakeholders who are unable to attend in person.
>>
>> •       Equality of participation: It is vital to the legitimacy of 
>> the forum that all stakeholders participate on an equal basis. Since 
>> the forum is expected to act as a facilitating body without binding 
>> decision making capacity, equal footing for all participants is the 
>> most effective working principle to enable high quality results.
>>
>> •       Thematic autonomy: The Forum must be free to choose its topics 
>> as it considers appropriate. Most topics relevant to Internet 
>> Governance are cross-cutting issues, which touch upon the 
>> responsibilities and competences of existing organizations. However, 
>> the forum should not be seen as their competitor. The IGF will 
>> function as a facilitator that promotes enhanced cooperation amongst 
>> all involved bodies by generating and diffusing "best-practice" and 
>> "lessons learned" forms of knowledge.
>>
>> •       Forum as process: The forum should be designed as an ongoing 
>> process with most of its work taking place throughout the year in 
>> smaller thematic groups over the Internet. Its face to face meetings 
>> should constitute just one element in this process.
>>
>> •       Accessible location: The highest priority in choosing 
>> locations for the forum should be accessibility to all potential 
>> participants. In considering perspective locations issues such as: 
>> proximity to governmental missions and the local hotel and transit 
>> infrastructure should be balanced with concerns about travel costs and 
>> the availability of entrance visas.
>>
>> •       Transparency: For the sake of its legitimacy, the forum must 
>> take an open and transparent approach to its structure, procedures, 
>> membership and to all of its deliberations and recommendations. The 
>> forum must publish regular and frequent reports detailing its activities.
>>
>>
>> II Tasks of the Forum on Internet Governance
>>
>>
>> The Tunis Agenda for the Information Society calls on the Internet 
>> Governance Forum (IGF) to play a multidimensional, catalytic role in 
>> relation to existing Internet governance mechanisms.  Among other 
>> things, the Forum should:
>>
>> •       Facilitate the exchange of information and best practices 
>> between bodies dealing with different international public policies 
>> regarding the Internet and discuss issues that do not fall within the 
>> scope of any existing body. In this regard the Forum should make full 
>> use of the expertise of the academic, scientific and technical 
>> communities;
>>
>>      Interface: with appropriate inter-governmental organizations 
>> and other institutions on matters under their purview;
>>
>>      Strengthen and enhance the engagement of stakeholders in 
>> existing and/or future Internet Governance mechanisms, particularly 
>> those from developing countries;
>>
>>      Identify emerging issues, bring them to the attention of the 
>> relevant bodies and the general public, and, where appropriate, make 
>> recommendations;
>>
>> •       Contribute to capacity-building for Internet Governance in 
>> developing countries, drawing fully on local sources of knowledge and 
>> expertise;
>>
>> •       Promote and assess, on an ongoing basis, the embodiment of 
>> WSIS principles in Internet Governance processes.
>>
>>
>> jeanette
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> governance mailing list
>> governance at lists.cpsr.org
>> https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance
> 
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
governance at lists.cpsr.org
https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance