[governance] ITU IG Resolution

Parminder parminder at itforchange.net
Sat Dec 30 23:52:42 EST 2006


Yes, it is important we get going. Since having a draft is the best way to
get going, if it is fine with all of you, I will attempt one in the next 3-4
days, and we can discuss and input into it....

Parminder 

________________________________________________
Parminder Jeet Singh
IT for Change, Bangalore
Bridging Development Realities and Technological Possibilities 
Tel: (+91-80) 2665 4134, 2653 6890
Fax: (+91-80) 4146 1055
www.ITforChange.net 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adam Peake [mailto:ajp at glocom.ac.jp]
> Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2006 2:48 PM
> To: governance at lists.cpsr.org
> Subject: Fwd: Re: [governance] ITU IG Resolution
> 
> Any thoughts on writing to Nitin Desai asking for an update on
> enhanced cooperation?  And working on statements/contributions to the
> February consultation? (about 6 weeks away.)
> 
> Adam
> 
> 
> 
> >Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 07:58:17 +0900
> >To: governance at lists.cpsr.org
> >From: Adam Peake <ajp at glocom.ac.jp>
> >
> >>Milton Mueller ha scritto:
> >>>Good statement. Some of us have never avoided these issues. I would
> >>>make two suggestions:
> >>>1. You are now one of the coordinators of IGC therefore you are in a
> >>>position to exert leadership and take initiative in this regard, so
> >>>let's see some specific proposals. Adam made a one (send a letter to
> >>>Desai asking what's up with Enhanced cooperation) which is fine
> although
> >>>it is a very modest initiative.
> >>
> >>I would support something like that, and, for example, I could
> >>forward it to the EU (the original proposer of the "enhanced
> >>cooperation" moniker). We could try to make as much noise as
> >>possible to ask what's up and request inclusion.
> >
> >
> >This fits with what I'm thinking: a letter asking for
> >progress/update, why aren't we being told, and we would like to be
> >involved. And cc'ing govt and others we know interested to see if
> >they will also then ask the same questions might be helpful.
> >
> >Adam
> >
> >____________________________________________________________
> >You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
> >     governance at lists.cpsr.org
> >To be removed from the list, send any message to:
> >     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
> >
> >For all list information and functions, see:
> >     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
> 
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>      governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
> 
> For all list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance



More information about the Governance mailing list