[governance] New dot com agreement changes USG-ICANN relationship
Jeanette Hofmann
jeanette at wz-berlin.de
Thu Dec 7 07:57:57 EST 2006
Danny,
don't take the "glorification" too literally. What I meant to say is
that disappointment with private forms of governance should not make us
blind for the shortcoming of governmental or intergovernmental forms of
governance.
At the risk of getting bashed for it, I sometimes wonder if ICANN's
transparency has the paradoxical effect of evoking criticism that
intergovernmental organizations avoid simply by hiding their failures
better.
jeanette
Danny Butt wrote:
> Hi Jeanette/all
>
> I find it interesting that internet culture is so hostile to the idea
> of government that even mild recognition quickly becomes
> "glorification" :7. I have no great love for intergovernmental systems,
> but they do some things relatively well, or at least better than
> existing alternatives. Geographical diversity and due process would be
> high on my list.
>
> While I think that "transparency" in the development sector is highly
> overrated (and often a tool to enable ICT-rich organisations to get
> contracts where "publishing on the internet" is equated with
> transparency), I agree it is an important component of accountability.
> However, it's far from the only component, or even the most important.
>
> My point is that what constitutes "performance" will be assessed
> differently by different people, and there is a rather large
> geopolitical/socio-cultural imbalance in positive evaluations of
> existing Internet Governance entities. Civil Society's stand on that
> imbalance will, in my opinion, be critical to its long-term voice in IG
> arrangements.
>
> Or to put it more simply, if CS buys the line that everything is fine
> as long as it gets seats at the table, then it may soon find itself in
> an expensive, empty restaurant with bad food and worse company, while
> the masses eat elsewhere.
>
> Regards,
>
> Danny
>
>
> On 07/12/2006, at 7:53 AM, Jeanette Hofmann wrote:
>
>> On further reflection, we should not glorify intergovernmental
>> processes and institutions. Even if the ITU is more inclusive as far
>> as participation of governments is concerned, we don't know much
>> about balances of powers between governments. And even if there are
>> formal mechanisms of accountability, we don't know whether they are
>> effective.
>>
>> ICANN is much more transparent than any intergovernmental
>> organization. This is why we can observe its shortcomings on a
>> regular basis. I wouldn't be able to say if closed intergovernmental
>> organizations such as the ITU violate or stretch their own rules more
>> or less than ICANN. What seems safe to say is trust in an
>> organization requires better performance.
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
> governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
> governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>
> For all list information and functions, see:
> http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
For all list information and functions, see:
http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
More information about the Governance
mailing list