[governance] New dot com agreement changes USG-ICANN relationship

[Veni Markovski]

At 06:45 PM 03.12.2006 '?.'Ъ▄Ж  +0100, Wolfgang KleinwДchter wrote:

>Is there any offcial comment by the USG on the 
>ITU Resolution 102 from Antalya? Is there some 
>interpretation what means what? US Government 
>obviously has supported (or watered down and 
>when yes what was the earlier version?) the 
>text. You will find in the adopted text seven 
>times "enhanced cooperation", half a dozen times 
>"domain names and IP addresses" but ICANN is not 
>mentioned at all. Is this a new US 
>double-strategy? Or a farewell to "private sector leadership"?

Wolfgang,
you surely know that these discussion are held 
behind closed doors, and no information is allowed to leak.
We can all interprete as much as we want, and 
find ourselves engaged in useless discussions - 
that's not a problem. But do you really want this?
Say, your conference on ICANN in Prague was quite 
a substential one. May be someday you will have 
it as part of the ITU Telecom - may be even next 
year in Sofia? This is where we could contribute, 
and this is where we can make a difference.



Sincerely,
Veni Markovski
http://www.veni.com

check also my blog:
http://blog.veni.com


____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance