[governance] need for a host country agreement?

[Stephane Bortzmeyer]

On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 11:23:27PM +0300,
 Veni Markovski <veni at veni.com> wrote 
 a message of 33 lines which said:

> People tend to forget things, which are obvious.

Yes, thanks for telling us that ICANN was not incorporated in
California to be sure that Internet governance would remain in US
hands. No, not at all, ICANN was incorporated in California by
sensible persons who were deeply and sincerely committed to the
interested of Internet users.

Now, let's stop propaganda. If a country (say, Finland or Costa-Rica)
had a local law which gives *more* rights to the directors and members
than the California law, would you support an immediate relocation of
ICANN to this country?
_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
governance at lists.cpsr.org
https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance