[governance] need for a host country agreement?

[Veni Markovski]

At 13:30 28-09-05  +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
>Yes, thanks for telling us that ICANN was not incorporated in
>California to be sure that Internet governance would remain in US
>hands. No, not at all, ICANN was incorporated in California by
>sensible persons who were deeply and sincerely committed to the
>interested of Internet users.
>
>Now, let's stop propaganda. If a country (say, Finland or Costa-Rica)
>had a local law which gives *more* rights to the directors and members
>than the California law, would you support an immediate relocation of
>ICANN to this country?

Dear Stephane,
Can we focus on something more on the topic of this mailing list? The 
problems of IG are not related to where ICANN is located. If you think 
ICANN is the issue of the IG, then you need to think twice.

best,
veni 

_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
governance at lists.cpsr.org
https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance