[governance] oversight stmt
Avri Doria
avri at acm.org
Thu Sep 29 05:02:55 EDT 2005
On 29 sep 2005, at 10.07, McTim wrote:
>
> 1. Many Thanks and well done on the potential compromise position.
thanks. and thanks to all of you for helping this get done is such a
short deadline pressured time.
now lets see if we can pull off another one for this evening
subcommittee meeting. even less time then before.
>
> 2. I don't think there is anyone in the caucus who stands for "no
> change ever ever"
i did not mean that those positions existed in the IGC, but rather
among the nations. and there is at least one 'no change ever ever'
govt.
>
> In my industry, we adapt or die. IG is constantly evolving. An example
> of this is this week's traffic from ARIN PPML.
did not see that. can you send a ptr?
>
> BTW, where do you stand on IPv6 PI?
i find Tony's arguments intriguing. i tend to support it
technically (anything to make the routing table smaller) but am not
sure about it from a policy perspective.
so what do you think of it.
a.
_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
governance at lists.cpsr.org
https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance
More information about the Governance
mailing list