[governance] protest statement drafted by Avri
Jeanette Hofmann
jeanette at wz-berlin.de
Wed Sep 28 04:42:10 EDT 2005
Hi everyone,
Avri has redrafted our statement on exclusion of stakeholders from the
drafting groups. We weren't be able to discuss it in plenary this
morning due to lack of time. We would thus like to read this statement
this morning on behalf of the IG caucus. Any objections to that? I know,
you americans are still sleeping. Sorry...
jeanette
Internet Governance Statement on the Decision to Exclude
Non-governmental stakeholders from Drafting Groups
September 27, 2005
0. We want to thank the chair for your personal efforts to ensure
transparency and inclusion. We also want to thank the many nations that
have supported the non-governmental organizations in our quest to fully
participate in this Prepcom. Now that it has become the practice of
some drafting groups to expel non-governmental participants, Civil
society is forced to protest
Civil Society believes all non-governmental partners should be able to
make statements on the same basis as agreed for the subcommittees, to
remain in the room as observers for the entire session and to further
contribute at the discretion of the chair of the drafting groups. Such
procedures would put into practice the commitment to the “full
participation of all stakeholders” (e.g. Para 39.)
1. The decisions to exclude non-governmental stakeholders from
meaningful participation in the drafting groups are not acceptable as a
matter of principle. The WSIS and the WGIG have affirmed that governance
of the Internet must be based on real partnerships with the
participation of all stakeholders in an open, inclusive and transparent
manner. These principles are central to the Geneva documents.
The decisions made to exclude non-governmental stakeholders from
meaningful participation in the drafting groups breaks these fundamental
conditions and undermines the legitimacy of all outcomes of the WSIS.
The sincerity of commitments made by some governments to these
principles is now open to question.
2. The decisions to exclude non-governmental stakeholders from the
drafting groups are not about rules and procedure, but rather a matter
of political courage and principle. In each meeting you have the choice:
to be inclusive or exclusive, to work in partnership, with transparency
and openness, or to chose not to do so. There was a great opportunity
here to move forward with all the progress we have made within the UN
and WSIS, but this has been a move backwards.
3. The Internet is the creation of the multi-stakeholder cooperation of
academia, civil society, governments, private sector and technologists.
There has never been a more successful multi-stakeholder partnership
than the one that has created and nurtured the Internet. Governments in
Geneva risk jeopardizing this partnership.
4. The WGIG process demonstrated that civil society organizations
contribute positively. Our exclusion deprives the Prepcom of valuable
knowledge, expertise and perspectives. Civil society has been, and will
continue to be, the main force for promoting capacity building and
development of the Internet in developing countries. Civil society
understands what is needed in order to continue that work, and exclusion
from the drafting groups makes it more difficult for us to continue that
work effectively.
5. The WSIS Plan of Action cannot be implemented by governments alone:
the active engagement of civil society actors is needed in the follow-up
stage; our exclusion today would discourage many from engaging after
Tunis and would therefore reduce the chances of effectively implementing
the ambitious Plan of Action of Geneva.
6. We strongly protest the decisions to exclude non-governmental
observers from the drafting groups. The Tunis declaration will be
meaningless if it is not seen as legitimate by all those involved in the
creation and evolution of the Internet, its applications, services and
content.
_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
governance at lists.cpsr.org
https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance
More information about the Governance
mailing list