[governance] Statement made in Plenary

[Avri Doria]

Well, making a statement in support to the western proposal after the  
chair's food was served, was in a sense an implicit comment that the  
food was not worth talking about, even if that was not the way it was  
planned.  he presented food and we said go back to the western proposal.

a.

On 1 okt 2005, at 20.23, Milton Mueller wrote:

>> From the peanut gallery, hours behind: why does this statement not
>>
> address the rather threatening "oversight" proposals made in the  
> Chair's
> "food for thought" paper?
>
>
>>>> Avri Doria <avri at psg.com> 09/30/05 7:48 PM >>>
>>>>
> hi,
>
> this was supposed to be made in subcommittee A, but the chair forgot
> to give us and CCBI a talking spot.  so after so quick footwork by
> Izumi, we were given a spot in the plenary.
>
> a.
>
> _______________________________________________
> governance mailing list
> governance at lists.cpsr.org
> https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance
>
>

_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
governance at lists.cpsr.org
https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance