[governance] oversight

[Vittorio Bertola]

Danny Butt ha scritto:
> Jeanette's suggestion makes a lot of sense to me. As well as not  
> being able to gain agreement on the role of governments, I don't  
> think that it's something that governments will take much notice of.  
> A viable proposal for how the non-government aspects of internet  
> governance can be revised in accordance with WSIS principles will, I  
> think, be seen by all players as a valuable contribution. That will  
> also be a strong base from which to make comments on governmental  
> activities (e.g. USG oversight) or proposals (e.g. GAC power).

Seeing my message, Avri's reply, and the following discussion, I think 
now we all agree to disagree on whether "one government (the US)" is 
better or worse than "all governments". So I too support Jeanette's 
idea, and I think we should (after pushing for "no governments") focus 
on proposals on how to make ICANN better, and how to make the forum a 
success.
-- 
vb.             [Vittorio Bertola - v.bertola [a] bertola.eu.org]<-----
http://bertola.eu.org/  <- Prima o poi...
_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
governance at lists.cpsr.org
https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance