[governance] Food for thought & next steps..

[Vittorio Bertola]

Jeanette Hofmann ha scritto:
> General language wouldn't do any harm to the forum, would it? I think we 
> know that the forum has to earn its political relevance, don't we?

I am just worried that, if the language is too vague, whatever attempt 
of getting any practical result out of it will be met with cries of 
"mission creep".

> I also think this is a likely outcome. Does it make sense then to 
> propose in our statement a shortlist of issues we think the forum should 
> focus on for a start?

I think that the WGIG list is good. That's why in my text I explicitly 
added (at the end of 3.) a new sentence that says "let's start from 
them". It might be easier to agree and push than an explicit list, in 
which everyone will try to push his/her pet issue.
-- 
vb.             [Vittorio Bertola - v.bertola [a] bertola.eu.org]<-----
http://bertola.eu.org/  <- Prima o poi...
_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
governance at lists.cpsr.org
https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance