[governance] Comments on latest version of chairs paper

[Vittorio Bertola]

Adam Peake ha scritto:
> Looking again at the Geneva statements would be a good starting 
> point, this is text we already have to hand, 

I agree, but I would take care and aim to produce actual drafting 
suggestions for section 5, mocking up the structure of other existing 
proposals. In many cases, our text is too long or not up to the point.

More generally speaking, I've noticed that current options seem to 
disregard the WGIG report. Perhaps a proposal more strictly modelled on 
the report (i.e. actually drawing text from it) might be acceptable to 
many (apart of course from the core oversight section).
-- 
vb.             [Vittorio Bertola - v.bertola [a] bertola.eu.org]<-----
http://bertola.eu.org/  <- Prima o poi...
_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
governance at lists.cpsr.org
https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance